Monday, February 10, 2014

Post 2: "Cochlear Implant Online"

Today I started exploring different blogs that would help me research my driving question about assistive technology for cochlear implant users. One blog that I found especially helpful was called "Cochlear Implant Online." The blog is dedicated to sharing information about all things related to cochlear implants, which made it a helpful source for information about assistive technology.

By searching within the blog for assistive technology, I was able to find various posts pertaining to the subject. One in particular that related to my 20% project was about FM Systems vs. Soundfields. This post informed me more about two types of technology that could help middle and high school students hear a teacher or speaker more clearly in class or at a large assembly.

FM speakers and Soundfields are two types of assistive technology that are similar in the sense that they both allow the speaker to directly talk into a microphone that will transmit sound to the student with a hearing impairment. FM systems, however, direct the transmitted sound directly into the listeners implant, whereas Soundfields direct the sound into an amplifying speaker system located near the student. Although both systems can be equally effective in enhancing the student's hearing, those monitoring the system have to make sure that the student is able to report sound quality accurately (this comes through practice). If the student is not yet skilled at determining sound quality, which is basically how accurately the student is able to rate if the device is working to the best of its ability, then instructors must rely on objective tests of sound quality, such as testing hearing in a sound booth, until the student is able to do so on his or her own.

This blog introduced me to two important types of technology that can help students hear better in large group settings. Next time, I hope to look into ways to hear more clearly through headphones or when talking to someone on the phone.

3 comments:

  1. 1. I appreciated how you both summarized and reflected the post you found. You then went on to tie it to your project as a whole and your future goals. I can tell you took time to work it out and make sure it follows your project.

    2. I'd like to see more comparison of the two: pros and cons.

    3. This does not really have anything to do with this post in particular, but I think it would be interesting to look at the evolution of cochlear implant technology. I found an article that talks about a future implant in the works: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/272439.php

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. You clearly spent a great amount of time with your research. You have become very familiar with all of the information, and it is paying off. You love your topic and I can tell!

    2. One of the best parts of an argument is that you can say the opposition to it. I would love to hear the controversies around cochlear implants.

    3. You should definitely look up other family stories about kids with cochlear implants! That could create a really cool connection between your story, your research, and others.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great comments and suggestions I see from Kelsey and Zoe to help Kelly's important project. Thanks and good job, all three of you!

    ReplyDelete